govweird/archive
Case FileNARA NAID 28988075 · T1206 Roll 39

Project Blue Book Case File

Clover, VermontAugust 1960

Insufficient Data

Summary

In August 1960, a resident of Clover, Vermont reported seeing an unidentified flying object. The sighting came to the attention of the U.S. Air Force through Senator Winston L. Prouty of Vermont, who forwarded the report on behalf of the witness.

The Air Force requested that the witness complete a detailed questionnaire so that officials at the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio could analyze the sighting. The questionnaire asked for precise information about the time, location, appearance, motion, and behavior of the object, as well as weather conditions and background details about the observer.

The OCR quality of the completed questionnaire is poor in places, making it difficult to extract specific details about what the witness saw, how long the object remained visible, or how it moved. The handwritten responses are largely illegible in the scanned document. On the front cover card, the Air Force's evaluation lists "Probably Balloon" as one possible conclusion, though the full reasoning behind any final determination does not appear clearly in the available pages.

The complete case file, as held by the National Archives, is reproduced below and consists of 13 pages.

Reported location

Clover, Vermont

Date of incident

August 1960

State / country

VT / US

Page count

13 scanned pages

USAF evaluation

unknown

Microfilm

T1206, Roll 39

Original case file scans

Original case file · scanned by NARAPage 1 of 13
Transcribed text
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

; 1. DATE 2 LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS

ory ~ Lr : vs | 0 Wes Ball

L August, 174( ulovar, J/ermont 0 Be toably Balloon

"  |3. DATE-TIME GROUP % TYPE OF OBSERVATION VOU wa— |
BE y 0 Wes Aircraft

——————————————————— -

Local — XX Ground- Visual O Ground-Redar D Probably Aircraft |
3 PRE + [IV | ool] oF A — 0 AirVisel O Air-Intercept Radar DO Possibly Aircraft
4 5. PHOTOS 4 I. Was Astronomical ote or

A O Yes 0 Probably Astronomical

| YS Ne ‘i.-ilian O Possibly Astronomical

§ RL LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 9. COURSE 0 Othe (io ee

1 O Insufficient Data for Evaluation
Jeis Secu wns i.orth 8 Unknown
i 10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING 11. COMMENTS | |
t 4agt that Lsowsz 1 a "potstellied iron she LW serintion is not genaral ly lize
1 # allt to. ut wing : re 1 $2 & yo! nt2 By a meotonr, however wie duiat ion and |
- Fants W3 in tne ml y, BN: Tae 9 mava~ait, at well as being redendt
et JF 1 be tat the taife & 2°1 Paiery {rrifeste thio nocsibility. shis reoort |
ALLE oF 1% YARED i, 145037897 ks BI ited wit me fro exter, :
| »® tne same Z time and {is evalia*ad

> A Meee

ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 OEP 52)
/ 13

Use ← → keys to navigate · scans hosted by the U.S. National Archives

Source: National Archives Catalog · NAID 28988075

Connected across the archive

Related case files