Page 619 of 703
Declassified CIA Family Jewels memo, June 2007 release. OCR transcribed by tesseract.js.
MORI DOCID 1451843
Page image

Source scan from the National Security Archive copy of the document. Open full PDF at this page →
OCR transcript4,822 chars
MORI DocID: 1451843 EES Re ides da (4) FI co. Noor soni ERR a ey . iia Prec se Ge 98 JES R. Scutzsinczs Hr & Gal Sn nate based, no doubt, on an assessment of the record of thé Soviet RE prise IE a ENE Lhe sie don e y AREER EE nS GE SR en: regime, and an exaggerated notion of how much the Chinese frankie on cae Lo nde HGR lee “Great Leap Forward” would accomplish. Perhaps the earlier sonata En po ee a “pessimism” regmding the relative performance pofential of jit aa Se ARS IAIN REEL GRAN CCl SY “free” and “controlled” economies was averdone, but have we Fee BCE, ns Bi EE Bh ver Joi a be 5 Hh Fe Contin Be rtd 8 not gone toe far in the now prevailing “optimism” that any clash phoney # Seniang RE eR VERS kA ER | between economic progress and the democratié institutions which had SRA APT) BECHLER ALAIN | insure the dominance of the vox populi is minimal? Ea SN I He A a) i The average citizen—particularly when he is il-housed, ill- J oe TR EN | clothed, fLfed, snd lloducated—seems most Tikly to be ine fit ARES Eb me terested in Lhe here and now, A government which is responsive fon Boosie Bedard nL es RE to the desires of the public will continually be tempted to Fru tie le at aa EER aber mortgage the future for the present. The “abstinence” or Koa fe aba be een rn STG BRR “waiting” which classical and neoclassical economics stale to RECREL | re Hemi T bn ea Le necessary ingredients in economic progress will be hard to pri Dent ed | require, as will be the incentive schemes (and the accompanying Hse fe Ene ee conspicuous consumption) which are likely to strike the average fe ey SHE Be EG SE ER Lo nequitable, We muy reed] that the Perc regime was Hear BE Le He, Te EA GI Me (and still may be?) the most popular regime in recent Latin feat Ree NRE RCRA ns American history. Or we may observe the economic consequences Rasa eo a of Brazilian democracy, and have our doubts. The inflow of Pisa fo aR TR Dia a American resources may be able to make showpieces out of oats de SEER iE BR SS dS several small, recently-democratized nations like the Dominican Resta Perio n Shnl n SEE Republic, bul we ought not assume either that democracy assists Bato Be fs nein nad hater EEE pres nee in economic development, or that the Dominican example is REP PRA foo Tn Le widely applicable. This is not to say that some judicions [ECENHIE Rs iy hd prodding in the direction of democracy may not be a wise policy, ACEI TE RL fried RE RERTIPIY S EP CLE but it must be judicions, and cannot be based on the assumption YEE WR Re en that democracy necessarily fosters the political stability essential Fata fic TE AER i a to growth, : SE REET - ER DoE One of the criteria by which self-help can be judged as justify- aah Plt Lr RR ST ing additional aid is an Improvement in the savings ratio. Some (nein RE Lg Ae students of the aid program would put major emphasis on LRGs prin Le ERE changes in the savings ratio in that it provides a relatively - rE ERLE Tale sbjective standard by which an improvement in cconomic. per- fein fol Eee formance can be judged. If we apply an objective standard, Eigdmbougn foes So hie SEES He RE x wii P fra ayy Ror RET Ea en SRT complaints about the distribution of aid and subjectivity in the [Esha RC a Ta RE NR ne TER ) - ERNE fone TED piped ee Edda tut * Charles Wolf, J5. of RAND has been dttempting to develop an econo- flo ss FR SE duds SL CRA. metric model which will provide an oljective measure of the performance fre fo LA Ee ST ARE A of aid recipiens in terms of self-help. The criterion is the savings ratio. eT ps mn TR TRE Te In the“model the attempt is made to eliminate the infivence of other SER EE AAR CE variables, such ms per capita income, income distribution, and degree of Bc Pcgna -. Sat Te ed ucbanization, which account for a goad deal of the observed variation in Je Ea | ATE . PE AS SEE crx the savings ratio as between nations and between different periods of time. Shad RT i ery OTE J Esa | a RC ORATOR XN nl nmr LAI LO Hci, eat a TR a TE ET oT rE er pT ry SRE Ba EC Hs Ae te sr eR ES Ee on nee peak bat adag: a Eee Ee eh foonirys. SAE Ras ae LT a A Ee Tse ER EE 0 pla bE le ater oa Sh eit AREER rd MRE a ae ER ER ee ha Es BES be Reel ee fr rn Te FE TR ER RS REAR Aer Er Oe BAR a Rr TE Pr en TE ae an ah TERE Se ad Sema A UN aa a el ES ER a SELL ATR ER er Ge Rn a ER 7) Rd een RR a sa ER SI AE fi RE RO RE Re ee Re a Le eT Bir Vn TE Pe CE BR a Re EA a eh rE Ce Ca i ea Se eGR frre TR Le a Ee Se eh Ban Pda CN Pn ES TE RRR a IA hp lan Raa Ter ee ea EE NN PRA A SP NE LR ro RC Te EE ON a BR LE Re a (ERs Les oats, 5 EER te SC SE SELES SEER BRE Ga TH Sb SRG el Wh i VE Fok Ew CA ie Sr pa ET een gm be ee I BE EE LE te RE a GATE RRA, [a CEE er NaS Sea a aR Bsr ta ER Re Gltiesin latin i eee ie a a dle Sh sR ae EL RS Oa Pe SER media ese si bn a ER REE EEE EEE
Carbon-copy typewriter text from 1973, OCR'd by tesseract.js (Leptonica WASM). Errors and missed characters are expected; cross-check against the scan above.